Complete a nursing theorist video analysis/reflection of one of the ”nursing theorist videos” provided in the course. We highly recommend that you watch as many of these videos as you can throughout the course. This is a great opportunity for you to see and hear directly from the actual theorists that you are reading about in the text.
After watching one of the theorist videos, reflect on what you have learned.
Compose a paper that addresses the following:
Explain why you chose to watch this particular theorist’s video.
Describe the parts of your personal philosophy where you agree or disagree with this theorist.
Is there anything that surprised you in the video? If so, what surprised you?
Would you recommend this video to another student? If so, why would you recommend it?
What value did you receive from watching it?
Your paper should be 3 pages in length, in APA style, typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins. If outside sources are used, they must be cited appropriately.
Points Possible: 100
Rubric
NURS_500_DE – Video Reflection Rubric
NURS_500_DE – Video Reflection Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
40 to >32.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the theorist video. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions regarding the value of watching the specific theorist video. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the theorists’ ideas and how they relate to the student’s personal philosophy.
32.8 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts within the theorist video. Offers some detail and some examples regarding the value of watching the specific theorist. Makes some attempt to relate the theorist’s ideas to the student’s personal philosophy.
30 to >23.6 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts within the theorist video. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for the value of watching the specific theorist. Fails to relate the theorist’s ideas to the student’s personal philosophy.
23.6 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, responds with insufficient explanations for theorist choice, video value, and relation to personal philosophy.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40 to >32.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Includes explanation for why the student chose to watch the specific theorist. Describes the value of watching the video. Explains whether or not the student would recommend the video to another student and why.
32.8 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Includes explanation for why the student chose to watch the specific theorist. Describes the value of watching the video, but does not explain whether the student would recommend the video to another student and why.
30 to >23.6 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations of why the student chose the specific theorist video and the value of watching the video, although attempts are made. There is no mention of recommendations.
23.6 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the content in the video.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
15 to >12.3 pts
Meets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
12.3 to >11.25 pts
Approaches Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
11.25 to >8.85 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
8.85 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
5 to >4.1 pts
Meets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
4.1 to >3.75 pts
Approaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.
3.75 to >2.95 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
2.95 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
We offer the best custom writing paper services. We have answered this question before and we can also do it for you.
GET STARTED TODAY AND GET A 20% DISCOUNT coupon code DISC20
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.